|

Hunter's Choice States
Non-hunter's Choice States
|
In 2006 the
Central Flyway started a three-year trial to evaluate the effectiveness
of a new daily limit for ducks designed to maintain maximum hunting
opportunities in the future. These new regulations are being called the
Hunter’s Choice Bag Limit. For the duration of the trial, half of the 10
states in the Central Flyway will maintain similar
seasons as previous years, while the other five states will use the Hunter’s
Choice Bag Limit (see graphic).
South Dakota was selected as one of the states to try the new Hunter’s Choice Regulations.
The Problem: A long-term decline in pintail populations and a
small population of canvasbacks have led biologists to try and come up with
ways to limit the harvest of these ducks while allowing harvest of more
abundant species. In recent years, there have been “seasons within seasons”
where the take of pintails and canvasbacks was only allowed for 39 days of
the overall 74-day duck season. The Hunter’s Choice Bag Limit has the
potential to limit harvest on pintails and canvasbacks, like “seasons within
seasons”, and may be more acceptable to hunters than having partially closed
seasons on several ducks.
Hunter’s Choice uses an aggregate or combined bag limit category to
restrict the harvest of duck species needing special harvest management
consideration, while maintaining full hunting opportunity on abundant
species or stocks of ducks such as drake mallards. The Hunter’s Choice
aggregate bag limit category includes the hen mallard, pintail, canvasback,
and in Texas, a mottled duck, where only one of the duck species in the
aggregate category can be taken in the daily limit. For those species in the
aggregate bag category, the harvest of one will buffer the harvest of the
others, thus reducing the harvest of all. At the end of the trial the two
different types of regulations will be evaluated for their effectiveness in
limiting pintail and canvasback harvest and hunters will be surveyed to see
what set of regulations they prefer. |